How to Spot Fake Software Websites and Avoid Getting Scammed
July 30, 2025Windows 11 Pro vs Home vs Enterprise: Which License Should You Choose?
July 31, 2025Microsoft SQL Server is one of the most powerful database management systems on the market—but when it comes to licensing, confusion is common. The two main models, CAL (Client Access License) and Core-based licensing, are very different in cost structure and scalability.
In this quick guide, we break down the key differences and help you understand which option fits your needs.
What Is a CAL License?
CAL stands for Client Access License. With this model, you license the server, and then purchase a CAL for every user or device that accesses it.
Example:
You install SQL Server on one machine. If 10 employees need to access it, you must buy:
- 1 Server license
- 10 CALs (User or Device, depending on your setup)
Best for:
- Small to medium businesses
- Limited number of users
- Stable, predictable environments
Pros:
- Cheaper upfront if user count is low
- Easier to manage in small teams
Cons:
- Doesn’t scale well—cost increases quickly with more users
- Hard to manage in environments with external users or unknown access points
What Is a Core License?
The Core-based licensing model is simple:
You pay based on the number of physical or virtual cores the SQL Server is running on—not on users.
Example:
Your server has 8 physical cores. You need to purchase:
- 8 Core licenses (minimum 4 per processor)
Even if 500 users access the database, no extra CALs are needed.
Best for:
- Large businesses
- High user volume or public-facing apps
- Cloud or virtualized environments
Pros:
- Unlimited users
- More flexible for web services or large-scale deployments
- Easier to remain compliant
Cons:
- Higher upfront cost
- Wasted resources if you don’t use the server’s full capacity
Key Differences: CAL vs Core (Summary Table)
| Feature | CAL Licensing | Core Licensing |
|---|---|---|
| Licensing based on | Users or devices (CALs) | Number of cores |
| Ideal for | Small teams with known users | Large scale, many users |
| Scalability | Poor (cost increases with users) | Excellent (users are unlimited) |
| Cost structure | Lower upfront, limited growth | Higher upfront, unlimited use |
| Cloud/virtual use | Limited | Fully supported |
| External users | Not practical | Fully allowed |
Which One Should You Choose?
Choose CAL Licensing if:
- You have a fixed number of users or devices
- Your organization is small to mid-sized
- You don’t expect user growth
- Budget is limited, and compliance is easy to track
Choose Core Licensing if:
- You run web apps, APIs, or external-facing services
- You use virtualization or cloud infrastructure
- Your user count is high or unpredictable
- You prefer scalability and flexibility
Final Thoughts
Both CAL and Core licensing have legitimate use cases—it’s not about which is “better,” but which matches your real-world needs.
Buying the wrong license type can result in:
- Overpaying
- Compliance issues during audits
- Poor scalability
If you’re unsure, the Core model offers broader flexibility, especially in modern, cloud-based infrastructures.
Need Help Choosing the Right SQL Server License?
At Digitalicence, we offer both CAL and Core licensing for SQL Server 2022, with:
- Transparent pricing
- Expert support
- Fast license delivery
- Official Microsoft activation
Talk to us before you buy—we’ll help you get the best value for your setup.
